Author
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.23 08:39:00 -
[1 ]
I think CCP should setup a Wiki to let the players write a new tutorial that covers what you actually need to know in EVE. Covered topics would be suicide ganking, corp war-decs, exactly where space is not safe and what people will do to you there, why everyone will kill you in 0.0 but also how the biggest problems are gateway systems etc. With the accumulated knowledge and writing power of the community, I think we could end threads like this and write a tutorial which explained the deal to new players much better. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.23 11:30:00 -
[2 ]
EVE Online | EVE Insider | Forums | 203
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.23 11:30:00 -
[3 ]
I'm against this. I'm sorry but Jita just wouldn't be Jita if I flew in there and someone wasn't suicide ganking a foolishly loaded industrial ship. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.23 16:05:00 -
[4 ]
This thread is and continues to remain BS. High-sec ganking is right exactly as it is (with the exception of perhaps an insurance nerf). Once again: CONCORD is stretched to the limit trying to protect Empire space. When they hear about a gank, they warp in, enforce the law and then leave. They do not care who or what the pod pilot was carrying, they care justice was done. Likewise, they don't care who takes whatever survived if the victim died before they arrived - it doesn't concern them, they have better things to do. This is EVE. We do not care about you. Deal with it. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.23 16:17:00 -
[5 ]
Originally by: Bhaal Originally by: James Duar This thread is and continues to remain BS. High-sec ganking is right exactly as it is (with the exception of perhaps an insurance nerf). Once again: CONCORD is stretched to the limit trying to protect Empire space. When they hear about a gank, they warp in, enforce the law and then leave. They do not care who or what the pod pilot was carrying, they care justice was done. Likewise, they don't care who takes whatever survived if the victim died before they arrived - it doesn't concern them, they have better things to do. This is EVE. We do not care about you. Deal with it. Since when is theft not against the law? This is EVE, and you're an ass... I could go on... Let the can flag, but it's not like the victim will go and get it in time. And you might note CONCORD don't care about can thefts beyond letting pilots sort it out amongst themselves. Ad hominem will get you absolutely nowhere, and you're pretty much as a standstill anyway when you're willing to ignore the game mechanics as they exist. If CCP didn't want high-sec ganking, then they could just make neutrals untargettable/unshootable or CONCORD respond instantly. They didn't. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.24 09:02:00 -
[6 ]
Originally by: Infinity Ziona I agree with you Bhaal 100%. Avon seems to think that because killing in high sec is ok as long as you lose your ship that any method which can accomplish that kill is fine as well. Even if the reason for using that method is for the purpose of circumventing the purpose of the rule in the first place. I'm totally fine with removing the high-sec gank system provided the ability to mug idiots remains. If we can't gank then I should be able to match velocities and rob your cargo bay or something. If you're foolish enough to travel blindly with billions of real or potential ISK onboard, then you deserve to lose it for the same reasons people don't walk around at night covered in gold jewllery w/o body guards. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.25 02:24:00 -
[7 ]
Originally by: Bhaal Quote: Early EVE minus the bugs would beat new EVE any time Nope, not in my opinion... The more restrictions the the griefer play style, the better the game gets... What is EVE without back alley systems where only the foolhardy venture, crowded slums like Jita where the living is fast and short etc. Provided it's avoidable in a sensible way, I approve of it! --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.25 10:14:00 -
[8 ]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: Nanobotter Mk2 1)I PROMISE i am a bigger bad arse in RL in game anyplace any time than you, so please save the I am a big bad tough guy gamer i can take the lawlessness, sorry you can;t attitude. Well, there you go. Point 1 and you lose any shred of credibility you may have had. Thinking about it, that sounds like it is verging on a RL threat... People making RL threats are so cute, right upto the point where they get banned. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.26 04:38:00 -
[9 ]
Originally by: Kunming Originally by: csebal ... Look dude I dont know how old you are but you apparently have no idea about real life. I got stabbed by a knife when I refused to had over my wallet and when the police arrived they arrested me cause the dude that tried to rob me had no more nose, chin or frontal teeth. It all got cleared up at the office ofcourse and I had to pay nothing for the plastic surgery of the offender. When I go on the street I'm more than ready to defend my self. There is no such option in EVE, you have to sit there watch getting raped and then have your stuff stolen by an alt. I spent all my game time in 0.0 as all this empire disgusts me, the carebear industrialists and the carebear pirates.. simply disgusting. And by your attitude its pretty clear you're one of these 12 year old kiddies who do this kind of cheap bull****. You wouldnt be able to pull this off in 0.0, as you would get your ass firmly handed to you before you could say "Warp drive active". Its ppl like you who never even put them self in the position of getting defeated aka carebears. Oh yeah and I'm probably gonna leave the game too.. so add me to your "Oh look at the idiots" list and be glad these are only forums as I would break your neck before you could make another ******** comment like that to my face. This game was fine, as long as the average player age was between 25-40, not worth wasting another penny for the amusement of some elf **** watching teenager. It's people like you that make me keep coming back to the forums purely for more of the guffawths! I also take solace in knowing one day you're going down for assault apparently. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.26 10:26:00 -
[10 ]
Originally by: Moostang Suiciding in Empire should not be allowed. It is yet another way griefers get their rox off. For offenses that concord respond to in force, damage from the attacker should be nulified imho. So you didn't read the thread, or any of the intelligent discouse intermingled with the stupidity at all, and instead decided to add some more of your own. The reasons to Empire gank have been explained. If it were just griefing then there are cheaper and easier ways to do it. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!
James Duar
Posted - 2006.06.28 10:15:00 -
[11 ]
High sec ain't for the thrill of the kill. It's for the hope that someone will move a T2 BPO in a poorly made craft for the job. --- Encrypted Client Side Bookmarks! Raise YOUR voice to CCP. Let's end slow copy times and bookmark lag for good!